We reported earlier this month about these iPod Nano 6 clones complete with touch screens, but now we have a few more details and some better pictures to throw at you. The body is constructed from ...

As you can read in our review above, the Gen 6 iPod Nano does not play videos or apps. If you want video capability, we recommend buying the previous generation Gen 5 iPod Nano or the iPod Classic.

As far as they’re concerned, Apple already released -- and then withdrew -- its first watch when it introduced the 6 th generation of its iPod Nano in 2010. STORY: Waiting for Apple’s iWatch.

We'll just come out and say it: the sixth-generation iPod nano feels very un-nano-like. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but it definitely feels and "acts" more like a shuffle, but with a screen.

With the sixth edition of the iPod nano, Apple has given the nano line its biggest makeover yet, including shrinking the player down and adding a Multi-Touch display. While some of these changes ...

The new iPod nano is wider (2.06 inches versus 1.6 inches) and shorter (2.75 inches vs. 3.5 inches) than the previous nano; the nano remains 0.26 inches thick.

Oxnard, CA – December 29, 2010 – HEX, the leading designer and manufacturer of fashionable tech accessories, is excited to announce the availability of the new HEX Watch Band for iPod nano ...

A brief word about sound quality: the iPod nano uses the same audio codec (the WM8975) as the 4G iPods. The first and second generation iPods used the WM8721, while the 3G iPods and iPod mini used ...

The new iPod nano brings a bigger screen, bluetooth support and a fresh design, but stops short of adding WiFi and a full version of iOS 6 that supports apps and streaming music. As an MP3 player ...

The iPod shuffle is similarly overpriced, costing $49 despite having just 2 gigabytes of storage, no screen, and a design even older than the iPod nano, dating back to 2010. It should probably be ...

The iPod thought I ran 2.74 miles at a pace of 7:24 per mile, when I actually ran 2.41 miles at 8:18/mile. During my first mile it thought I was running at a pace of 6:32 per mile. HA!