House V. NCAA settlement doesn't settle everything
Digest more
Top News
Overview
Impacts
Eight female athletes filed an appeal of a landmark NCAA antitrust settlement, arguing that women would not receive their fair share of $2.7B in back pay for athletes who couldn't cash in on NIL.
The appeal will not impact revenue sharing — slated to start July 1 — but will pause the back-pay damages portion of the settlement.
Now that the NCAA has taken care of its business, its president wants Congress to deliver. NCAA President Charlie Baker. long a proponent of federal legislation to lock in some of the seismic changes hitting college sports,
In their first extensive comments since Judge Claudia Wilken approved the House v. NCAA settlement last week, the commissioners of the five listed defendants -- the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12 and SEC -- expressed hope that the new revenue-sharing world it created will bring stability to what has been a tremendous period of upheaval within college athletics.
Paul Finebaum joins the Dan Patrick show to weigh in on the new NCAA settlement that opens the door for colleges to pay their athletes directly and how it will impact small schools, women's sports, and beyond.
Explore more
Following the NCAA settlement, UNLV now navigates a new landscape where schools directly pay athletes, backed by a $20.5M salary cap and cautious optimism.
Sam Webb and Steve Lorenz talk summer NIL and NCAA settlement in Michigan LB recruiting
Santiago believes settlement will benefit student-athletes not only financially but help put focus back on mission of the school.